Lonas v. Kail

Ohio Supreme Court

Lonas v. Kail

2001 Ohio 228, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1201

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 2001

Docket2000-0448

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 228 (Lonas v. Kail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lonas v. Kail, 2001 Ohio 228, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 1201.]

LONAS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KAIL, APPELLEE. [Cite as Lonas v. Kail, 2001-Ohio-228.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-448—Submitted December 12, 2000—Decided January 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Harrison County, No. 491. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent and would, instead, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Steven G. Thomakos, for appellants. Tate & Renner and Richard R. Renner, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 1201.]

LONAS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KAIL, APPELLEE. [Cite as Lonas v. Kail, 2001-Ohio-228.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-448—Submitted December 12, 2000—Decided January 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Harrison County, No. 491. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent and would, instead, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Steven G. Thomakos, for appellants. Tate & Renner and Richard R. Renner, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 228, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lonas-v-kail-ohio-2001.