Lomtevas v. City of Schenectady

2026 NY Slip Op 00656
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 2026·No. 13 CA 25-00955·Published

Opinion

Lomtevas v City of Schenectady (2026 NY Slip Op 00656)
Lomtevas v City of Schenectady
2026 NY Slip Op 00656
Decided on February 11, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 11, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CURRAN, MONTOUR, SMITH, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.

13 CA 25-00955

[*1]PETER C. LOMTEVAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, MAXINE L. BARASCH, AS CORPORATION COUNSEL, MARYANN ALLI, AS PERSONNEL AND BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR, ANTHONY FERRARI, AS COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF CITY OF SCHENECTADY AND GARY R. MCCARTHY, AS MAYOR OF CITY OF SCHENECTADY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


PETER C. LOMTEVAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

GIRVIN & FERLAZZO, P.C., ALBANY (THOMAS H. FISHER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Schenectady County (Paul E. Davenport, J.), entered October 17, 2024. The order granted the motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 11, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lomtevas v. City of Schenectady, 2026 NY Slip Op 00656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

2026 NY Slip Op 00656 (Lomtevas v. City of Schenectady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.