Lomonaco v. Myrtle Beach Resort Homeowners' Association

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 6, 2012
Docket2012-MO-019
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lomonaco v. Myrtle Beach Resort Homeowners' Association (Lomonaco v. Myrtle Beach Resort Homeowners' Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lomonaco v. Myrtle Beach Resort Homeowners' Association, (S.C. 2012).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court __________ Lisa Everitt Lomonaco, Appellant,

v. The Myrtle Beach Resort Homeowners' Association, Inc., Respondent. __________

Appeal from Horry County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge __________

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-019 Heard May 1, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012

___________

AFFIRMED ___________

Bradley A. Floyd, of Surfside Beach, for Appellant.

Timothy A. Domin, of Clawson & Staubes, of Charleston, for Respondent.

___________ PER CURIAM: Appellant claims the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent when Appellant, who was voluntarily intoxicated, sustained injuries after jumping or falling from an eighth floor balcony located on Respondent's property. We disagree and affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Tobias v. Sports Club, Inc., 332 S.C. 90, 504 S.E.2d 318 (1998) (recognizing an absolute bar to "'first party' cause[s] of action against [a] tavern owner by an intoxicated adult predicated on an alleged violation of [alcohol control statutes,]" and elaborating that "public policy is not served by allowing the intoxicated adult patron to maintain a suit for injuries which result from his own conduct"); Lydia v. Horton, 355 S.C. 36, 583 S.E.2d 750 (2003) (relying on Tobias to bar plaintiff's recovery where plaintiff, who drove a vehicle after becoming voluntarily intoxicated and sustained injuries in a car accident, sued the person who loaned plaintiff the car under a theory of negligent entrustment).

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lydia v. Horton
583 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2003)
Tobias v. Sports Club, Inc.
504 S.E.2d 318 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lomonaco v. Myrtle Beach Resort Homeowners' Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lomonaco-v-myrtle-beach-resort-homeowners-association-sc-2012.