Lomoe v. Castells Tire Barn, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Lomoe v. Castells Tire Barn, Inc.

2017 OK 99, 410 P.3d 1013

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 11, 2017

DocketCase Number: 116139

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 OK 99 (Lomoe v. Castells Tire Barn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lomoe v. Castells Tire Barn, Inc., 2017 OK 99, 410 P.3d 1013 (Okla. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

¶1 In this matter, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that this Court's recent decision in Gibby v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. , 2017 OK 78 , 404 P.3d 44 (October 3, 2017), disposes of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides: "In any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. Stat. tit. 12, ch. 15, app. 1 (2011).

¶2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission is vacated, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed, and the matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with the opinion in the controlling decision.

¶3 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE the 11th day of December, 2017.

CONCUR: Combs, C.J., Watt, Edmondson, Colbert, and Reif, JJ.

CONCUR IN PART DISSENT IN PART: Gurich, V.C.J, Kauger, J.

DISSENT: Winchester, J.

NOT PARTICIPATING: Wyrick, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶1 In this matter, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that this Court's recent decision in Gibby v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. , 2017 OK 78 , 404 P.3d 44 (October 3, 2017), disposes of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides: "In any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. Stat. tit. 12, ch. 15, app. 1 (2011).