Lombillo v. Department of Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lombillo v. Department of Professional Regulation

537 So. 2d 1079, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 236, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 243, 1989 WL 3891

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1989

DocketNo. 87-1715

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 1079 (Lombillo v. Department of Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lombillo v. Department of Professional Regulation, 537 So. 2d 1079, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 236, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 243, 1989 WL 3891 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals a final order of the Department of Professional Regulation in which the Board of Medicine revoked his license to practice medicine in the state of Florida. The Board accepted the hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law but rejected his recommendation of a two-year suspension of appellant’s license. The record contains overwhelming competent substantial evidence to support the revocation and the Board complied with the requirements of section 120.57(l)(b)(10), Florida Statutes, with its recitation of reasons for increasing the penalty. Therefore, we affirm.

WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals a final order of the Department of Professional Regulation in which the Board of Medicine revoked his license to practice medicine in the state of Florida. The Board accepted the hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law but rejected his recommendation of a two-year suspension of appellant’s license. The record contains overwhelming competent substantial evidence to support the revocation and the Board complied with the requirements of section 120.57(l)(b)(10), Florida Statutes, with its recitation of reasons for increasing the penalty. Therefore, we affirm.

WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 1079, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 236, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 243, 1989 WL 3891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombillo-v-department-of-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-1989.