Lombardo v. Trans Union, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 2025
Docket7:20-cv-06813
StatusUnknown

This text of Lombardo v. Trans Union, LLC (Lombardo v. Trans Union, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lombardo v. Trans Union, LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

Ch po FUSE SUINE ambers of Vincent L. Briccettj DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT {ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC # ___ enn □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ "DATE FILED: □□□□□□ LISA LOMBARDO, 4 ee Plaintiff, : : ORDER V. 20 CV 6813 (VB) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., : Defendant. ee ee enn wenn ee een eee nes ener seen es XK On January 31, 2025, counsel for defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., jointly with interested party Daniel Schlanger, Esq., filed a letter motion to seal and redact portions of plaintiff Lisa Lombardo’s memorandum of law in opposition to defendant’s motion to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement and her former counsel Schlanger Law Group, LLP’s motion to intervene, as well as her supporting declaration and exhibits. (Docs. ##297, 298). In particular, defendant and Mr. Schlanger seek to redact portions of plaintiff’s submissions that disclose settlement terms or proposed amened settlement terms. Plaintiff does not object to the proposed redactions. There is a presumption of public access to judicial documents, which includes memoranda of law and declarations. See Lugosch vy. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). However, there is no presumptive right of access to settlement discussions and documents. See United States v. Glen Falls Newspapers, Inc., 160 F.3d 853, 857 (2d Cir. 1998). For the reasons set forth in defendant’s letter-motion, the request to seal is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to place Docs. ##297 and 298 and its attachments under seal so they remain restricted to court users and plaintiff. The Clerk is further directed to terminate Doc. #296. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: February 3, 2025 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lombardo v. Trans Union, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardo-v-trans-union-llc-nysd-2025.