Lombardo v. Island Grill Diner

276 A.D.2d 532, 716 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10138
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 532 (Lombardo v. Island Grill Diner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lombardo v. Island Grill Diner, 276 A.D.2d 532, 716 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered October 15, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While delivering supplies to the defendant Island Grill Diner, the plaintiff allegedly stepped into a patch of grease, dirt, and oil in the defendant’s parking lot, and then slipped while walking down an interior flight of stairs, sustaining injuries. The Supreme Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiff is required to prove at trial that the defendant either created the condition that caused the plaintiff’s accident, or had actual or constructive notice of that condition (see, Pianforini v Kelties Bum Steer, 258 AD2d 634). In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant established that it neither created the pool of grease, dirt, and oil in the parking lot, nor had actual or constructive notice of the condition. In opposition, the plaintiff offered only speculation and conclusory statements, which were insufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment (see, Mercer v City of New York, 223 AD2d 688; Sneeden v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 268 AD2d 519).

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finocchiaro v. AVR Realty Corp.
32 A.D.3d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Panetta v. Phoenix Beverages, Inc.
29 A.D.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pelaez v. Seide
300 A.D.2d 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Resnick v. Waldbaums Supermarket
289 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 532, 716 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardo-v-island-grill-diner-nyappdiv-2000.