Lombardi v. Wlazlo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lombardi v. Wlazlo

170 A.D.2d 653, 567 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3171

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 A.D.2d 653 (Lombardi v. Wlazlo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lombardi v. Wlazlo, 170 A.D.2d 653, 567 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Thomas Wlazlo appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered November 16, 1988, which denied his motion to compel the plaintiff's to produce X-rays, CAT scans and magnetic resonance images at the office of his physician.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Having timely supplied the appellant with duly executed authorizations for him to obtain access to, or copies of, the results of all diagnostic tests performed upon them, the plaintiffs fully satisfied the requirements of CPLR 3120 and 22 NYCRR 202.17. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Thomas Wlazlo appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered November 16, 1988, which denied his motion to compel the plaintiff's to produce X-rays, CAT scans and magnetic resonance images at the office of his physician.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Having timely supplied the appellant with duly executed authorizations for him to obtain access to, or copies of, the results of all diagnostic tests performed upon them, the plaintiffs fully satisfied the requirements of CPLR 3120 and 22 NYCRR 202.17. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D.2d 653, 567 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardi-v-wlazlo-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack