Lombardi v. State Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lombardi v. State Board of Elections

54 A.D.2d 532, 386 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 31, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 532 (Lombardi v. State Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lombardi v. State Board of Elections, 54 A.D.2d 532, 386 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 20, 1976 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, to invalidate a petition designating appellant Holihan as a candidate of the Conservative Party for the office of State Senator from the 50th Senatorial District. On this record, we find no merit in appellant’s contention that the respondent’s petition, as supplemented, is legally insufficient (see Matter of Reich v Power, 30 AD2d 925). Special Term’s factual finding that sheets one and two of the designating petition were so permeated with fraud that the signatures thereon must be invalidated is [533]*533supported by the record. Furthermore, as to sheets three, four and five of the petition, since the person who acted as a commissioner of deeds on these sheets admittedly did not swear any of the persons whose signatures appear thereon, these signatures were properly invalidated (Election Law, § 135, subd 2; Matter of Donnelly v Dowd, 17 AD2d 712, affd 12 NY2d 651). We have considered the contentions raised by petitioner on his cross appeal and find them to be without merit. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 20, 1976 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, to invalidate a petition designating appellant Holihan as a candidate of the Conservative Party for the office of State Senator from the 50th Senatorial District. On this record, we find no merit in appellant’s contention that the respondent’s petition, as supplemented, is legally insufficient (see Matter of Reich v Power, 30 AD2d 925). Special Term’s factual finding that sheets one and two of the designating petition were so permeated with fraud that the signatures thereon must be invalidated is [533]*533supported by the record. Furthermore, as to sheets three, four and five of the petition, since the person who acted as a commissioner of deeds on these sheets admittedly did not swear any of the persons whose signatures appear thereon, these signatures were properly invalidated (Election Law, § 135, subd 2; Matter of Donnelly v Dowd, 17 AD2d 712, affd 12 NY2d 651). We have considered the contentions raised by petitioner on his cross appeal and find them to be without merit. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 532, 386 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardi-v-state-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack