Lombardi v. Lombardi

673 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5111, 1996 WL 252849
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1996·No. Nos. 95-0011, 95-0208 and 95-1592·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

In calculating the father’s income for purposes of child support in this dissolution of marriage action, the court imputed additional income in an amount equal to 100% of an automobile allowance given him by his employer. We reverse this imputation.

On remand, the court should determine how much of the allowance represents reimbursement for the use of his automobile in the employer’s business and how much, if any, represents income to the father. Only the latter may be imputed for purposes of calculating his child support obligation.

In all other respects we affirm on all issues.

STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lombardi v. Lombardi, 673 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5111, 1996 WL 252849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 175 (Lombardi v. Lombardi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vergara v. Vergara
831 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)