Lombardi v. Lombardi

673 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5111, 1996 WL 252849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1996
DocketNos. 95-0011, 95-0208 and 95-1592
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 175 (Lombardi v. Lombardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lombardi v. Lombardi, 673 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5111, 1996 WL 252849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

In calculating the father’s income for purposes of child support in this dissolution of marriage action, the court imputed additional income in an amount equal to 100% of an automobile allowance given him by his employer. We reverse this imputation.

On remand, the court should determine how much of the allowance represents reimbursement for the use of his automobile in the employer’s business and how much, if any, represents income to the father. Only the latter may be imputed for purposes of calculating his child support obligation.

In all other respects we affirm on all issues.

STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vergara v. Vergara
831 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5111, 1996 WL 252849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardi-v-lombardi-fladistctapp-1996.