Lombardi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lombardi v. City of New York

46 A.D.2d 750, 361 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 750 (Lombardi v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lombardi v. City of New York, 46 A.D.2d 750, 361 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 28, 1974, insofar as it granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on her first cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on her first cause of action, and granting defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the first cause of action and dismissing said cause of action, and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In her first cause of action plaintiff seeks to recover the cash equivalent of the terminal leave allowance to which her deceased husband would have been entitled had he retired on September 10, 1972. Unfortunately, he passed away on September 11, 1972, while still in the employ of the City of New York. Plaintiff 'has established neither a contractual nor a statutory right to the relief which she seek's in her first cause of action. The “ death gamble ” provision (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B3-36.0,. subd. 4, par. [d]), relied on by plaintiff, does not apply to the (facts or subject matter (terminal leave) encompassed by the first cause of action. The term “ retirement allowance ”, as used in the cited section of the Administrative Code, does not include terminal leave pay. (See Administrative Code, § B3-1.0, subd. 15.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P.=, Lupiano, Steuer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ. [78 Mise 2d 1057.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 28, 1974, insofar as it granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on her first cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on her first cause of action, and granting defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the first cause of action and dismissing said cause of action, and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In her first cause of action plaintiff seeks to recover the cash equivalent of the terminal leave allowance to which her deceased husband would have been entitled had he retired on September 10, 1972. Unfortunately, he passed away on September 11, 1972, while still in the employ of the City of New York. Plaintiff 'has established neither a contractual nor a statutory right to the relief which she seek's in her first cause of action. The “ death gamble ” provision (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B3-36.0,. subd. 4, par. [d]), relied on by plaintiff, does not apply to the (facts or subject matter (terminal leave) encompassed by the first cause of action. The term “ retirement allowance ”, as used in the cited section of the Administrative Code, does not include terminal leave pay. (See Administrative Code, § B3-1.0, subd. 15.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P.=, Lupiano, Steuer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ. [78 Mise 2d 1057.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 750, 361 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardi-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack