Lombardi Et Ux. v. Demasi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Lombardi Et Ux. v. Demasi

49 A.2d 64, 159 Pa. Super. 583

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 9, 1946

DocketAppeal, 192

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.2d 64 (Lombardi Et Ux. v. Demasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lombardi Et Ux. v. Demasi, 49 A.2d 64, 159 Pa. Super. 583 (Pa. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment in ejectment was confessed against defendant-appellant who, under a written lease, was tenant of the owner. The owner sold the premises to plaintiffs-appellees and assigned the lease to them. The court below refused to open the judgment, and defendant appealed alleging that the assignment was to only one of the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, although the copy of the assignment shows the contrary. The appeal has no merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Judgment in ejectment was confessed against defendant-appellant who, under a written lease, was tenant of the owner. The owner sold the premises to plaintiffs-appellees and assigned the lease to them. The court below refused to open the judgment, and defendant appealed alleging that the assignment was to only one of the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, although the copy of the assignment shows the contrary. The appeal has no merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.2d 64, 159 Pa. Super. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombardi-et-ux-v-demasi-pasuperct-1946.