Lombard v. Elliott

77 F.2d 496, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4640, 1935 A.M.C. 764
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 8, 1935·No. No. 7636·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

On a former appeal, Elliott v. Lombard, 72 F.(2d) 543, we reversed a judgment decreeing that the motorboat, Real, was solely at fault for a collision between herself and a barge in tow of the motorboat, Lucky Girl, and, holding both at fault, decreed that the damages be divided equally. The District Court had awarded interest from the date of the collision. Both our opinion and the mandate sent down were silent as to interest. The District Court, entering judgment on the mandate, declined to allow interest from the date of collision. This appeal, solely involving that question, followed.

The District Court correctly interpreted the mandate.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lombard v. Elliott, 77 F.2d 496, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4640, 1935 A.M.C. 764 (5th Cir. 1935).

77 F.2d 496 (Lombard v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Algonquin Deep Sea Research Corp. v. Perini Corp.
353 F. Supp. 561 (D. Massachusetts, 1973)