Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad

New York City Court

Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad

6 Misc. 602, 26 N.Y.S. 1136, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 904

DecidedDecember 15, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Misc. 602 (Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad, 6 Misc. 602, 26 N.Y.S. 1136, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 904 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant in this case conceded its liability, and its counsel seeks a new trial only on the ground that the damages fixed by the jury were excessive. We have carefully examined the appellant’s brief and the printed record, and conclude that we should not set aside the verdict, as it does not appear from the evidence to have been the result of sympathy or prejudice.

Present: Clement, Ch. J., and Van Wyok, J.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant in this case conceded its liability, and its counsel seeks a new trial only on the ground that the damages fixed by the jury were excessive. We have carefully examined the appellant’s brief and the printed record, and conclude that we should not set aside the verdict, as it does not appear from the evidence to have been the result of sympathy or prejudice.

Present: Clement, Ch. J., and Van Wyok, J.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Misc. 602, 26 N.Y.S. 1136, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lombard-v-brooklyn-city-railroad-nycityct-1893.