Lomax v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lomax v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.

120 S.E. 704, 31 Ga. App. 14

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 3, 1923

Docket14565

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 704 (Lomax v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lomax v. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co., 120 S.E. 704, 31 Ga. App. 14 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworti-i, J.

Under an attachment for purchase-money in favor of Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Company certain personal property was levied on and sold. A petition for a rule was brought by T. B. Lomax against the sheriff for the money arising from the sale. Under all the facts of the ease, the trial judge properly awarded the fund, less the costs, to the Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Company.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworti-i, J.

Under an attachment for purchase-money in favor of Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Company certain personal property was levied on and sold. A petition for a rule was brought by T. B. Lomax against the sheriff for the money arising from the sale. Under all the facts of the ease, the trial judge properly awarded the fund, less the costs, to the Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Company.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 704, 31 Ga. App. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lomax-v-woodruff-machinery-manufacturing-co-gactapp-1923.