Lomax v. Walker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6558

JAMES MESHACH LOMAX,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RENEE WALKER, Lieutenant; ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-02878-DKC)

Submitted: October 21, 2009 Decided: November 5, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Walker,

No. 8:07-cv-02878-DKC (D. Md. June 2, 2008 & Jan. 22, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED