Lomax v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lomax v. State

895 S.W.2d 204, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 260, 1995 WL 57898

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1995·No. No. 66376·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On June 23, 1993, movant’s jury trial on a charge of possession of heroin began. Apparently before the jury was finally selected, movant indicated his desire to plead guilty. Pursuant to Rule 24.02, the trial court informed movant of his rights and determined that the plea was voluntary.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On June 23, 1993, movant’s jury trial on a charge of possession of heroin began. Apparently before the jury was finally selected, movant indicated his desire to plead guilty. Pursuant to Rule 24.02, the trial court informed movant of his rights and determined that the plea was voluntary.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Lomax v. State, 895 S.W.2d 204, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 260, 1995 WL 57898 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 204 (Lomax v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.