Lomax v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
This text of 10 F. App'x 89 (Lomax v. Schindler Elevator Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Helen M. Lomax appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Schindler Elevator Corporation in her action in which she alleged a product liability claim and that Schindler’s negligence caused an elevator door to close too quickly on her, injuring her arm and shoulder. We have reviewed the briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lomax v. Schindler Elevator Corp., No. CA-00-199-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. App'x 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lomax-v-schindler-elevator-corp-ca4-2001.