Lomax v. Ottey

Fourth Circuit

Lomax v. Ottey

638 F. App'x 246

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2016·No. No. 15-7597·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey, No, 8:14-cv-02180-DKC, 2015 WL 4663786 (D.Md. filed Aug. 4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey, No, 8:14-cv-02180-DKC, 2015 WL 4663786 (D.Md. filed Aug. 4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lomax v. Ottey, 638 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

638 F. App'x 246 (Lomax v. Ottey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related