Lomax v. Ottey
This text of 638 F. App'x 246 (Lomax v. Ottey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey, No, 8:14-cv-02180-DKC, 2015 WL 4663786 (D.Md. filed Aug. 4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
638 F. App'x 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lomax-v-ottey-ca4-2016.