Lomax v. McBrayer

286 S.E.2d 35, 248 Ga. 753
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 7, 1982
Docket37937, 37938
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 286 S.E.2d 35 (Lomax v. McBrayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lomax v. McBrayer, 286 S.E.2d 35, 248 Ga. 753 (Ga. 1982).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The Fulton County School Employees’ Pension Board, individually and in their representative capacity, the Fulton County Board of Education, individually and in their representative capacity, and a retired Fulton County school teacher brought a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the payment of money into the Fulton County School Employees’ Pension Fund by the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, individually and in their representative capacity, the Fulton County Manager and the Fulton County Director of Finance. The petitioners obtained a mandamus absolute requiring the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, et al. (the County) to pay into the Fulton County School Employees’ Pension Fund the sum of $5,493,298.76 plus $1,522,651.23 in interest, *754 less $1,452,560.68 already paid by the County into the Pension Fund for a total required payment of $5,563,389.31. Counterclaims by the County for $1,442,560.66 (the amount which the County was allowed to set off against the judgment) and $18,727,248.51 (a sum paid into the Pension Fund from general county funds, which the County alleges should have been paid from educational funds) were dismissed.

In Case No. 37937, the County appeals. In Case No. 37938, the Pension Board appeals that portion of the judgment which allowed the County to set off $1,452,560.68 previously paid into the Pension Fund in excess of the obligation of the County to match the contributions to the fund by participants in the Pension Plan.

The parties agreed to a stipulation of facts, summarized as follows: Since the creation of the Fulton County School Employees’ Pension Plan in 1945, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners has been required to make annual contributions to the Pension Fund in an amount equal to the total annual employee contributions. From May 1,1945 through June 30,1968 the County paid matching funds into the Pension Fund each year without reducing such matching fund payments because of refunds paid to employees or former employees who had withdrawn from the Pension Plan during such year, i.e., the County matched the “gross” annual employee contributions. From July 1, 1968 through June 30,1981 the County has withheld from its matching fund contribution sums which equaled the amount refunded to employees or former employees who had withdrawn from the Pension Plan during the previous year, i.e., the County matched the “net” annual employee contributions. At the time the judgment was entered the total amount of matching funds so withheld by the County equaled $5,493,298.76, after subtracting an amount equal to the refunds paid to employees because of their mistaken overpayment of contributions, rather than their withdrawal from the Pension Plan, as the parties agreed that the County was entitled to credit for such refunds. In addition to the amounts paid into the Pension Fund by the County pursuant to its obligation to match employee contributions, the County paid $1,452,560.68 into the Fund on or about December 31,1980. Fulton County is also obligated to pay matching funds into the Fulton County General Employees’ Pension Fund and the Fulton County Judges’ and Solicitors’ Retirement Fund; however, the County has never reduced its contributions to these funds to adjust for refunds to withdrawing employees. Demand has been made on the Fulton County Board of Commissioners to pay the amounts in question, and the Board of Commissioners and other defendants have refused to pay such amounts. The Fulton County budget for the calendar year *755 1981 does not provide for the payment of the sum sought by the petition for mandamus.

The trial court found that the County was required under the Fulton County School Employees’ Pension Act (School Pension Act) to match the gross annual employee contributions to the Pension Fund, rather than the net annual contributions; that the amounts owed could be paid out of general county revenues and not only from educational funds; that the School Pension Act is not in conflict with the Georgia Constitution or any amendments thereto; that in any event the County is precluded from attácking the constitutionality of the School Pension Act on the grounds asserted by them as a result of the final judgment and pleadings in McLennan v. Aldredge, Case No. B-35088, decided April 2, 1968, Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (see McLennan v. Aldredge, 223 Ga. 879 (159 SE2d 682) (1968)); that the Pension Board was entitled to interest on the amount due; and that the County was entitled to set off the overpayment of $1,452,560.68 against the amount due.

I

In Case No. 37937 the County appeals the judgment of the trial court, listing nine enumerations of error.

1. The County contends that the trial court erred in issuing a writ of mandamus on the grounds that the Pension Board has an adequate remedy at law; that the Pension Board has no clear legal right to the relief sought; and that there was no showing that the County at any time had the funds to make the payments sought — that is, no showing that taxes were levied or collected therefor. Because we conclude that the County was obligated by the School Pension Act to match the gross contributions by employees to the Pension Fund (see Division 2), it follows that the Pension Board has a clear legal right to the relief sought. It also follows that the Pension Board is entitled to proceed directly against the individuals charged with compliance with the School Pension Act, rather than follow the procedures set out in Code Chapters 23-15 and 23-16, and mandamus is the proper remedy. Bulloch County v. Ritzert, 213 Ga. 818 (102 SE2d 40) (1958). Because the Board of Commissioners had a statutory duty to appropriate sums to make the required payments, it is no defense that it failed to do so. Commissioners of Roads and Revenues v. Martin, 161 Ga. 220 (6) (130 SE 569) (1925); Maddox v. Anchor Duck Mills, 167 Ga. 695 (1) (146 SE 551) (1929). This enumeration of error is without merit.

2. In the third enumeration of error the County contends that the trial court erred in holding that the Fulton County Board of Commissioners was required to match annually the gross and not the net employee contributions to the Pension Fund.

*756 The language of the School Pension Act is unambiguous, and will admit of no interpretation other than that given it by the trial court.

As originally enacted, the Act provided that “[a]t the beginning of each fiscal year, the Board of Commissioners shall appropriate a sum of money sufficient to match dollar for dollar the contributions made by the teachers and employees out of their salaries and wages for the previous fiscal year and in quarterly installments, pay the same out of public funds of said County to the Treasurer of the Pension Board.” Ga. L. 1945, pp. 528,532. The Act also provided for refunds to employees withdrawing from the Pension Plan before retirement (Ga. L. 1945, pp. 528, 532-533) and required that the “Board of Commissioners in the event of any deficit in said Pension Fund shall make up said deficit from its general funds or if necessary shall levy a sufficient tax to meet said deficit. ”(Ga.L. 1945, pp. 528, 536). Subsequent amendments to the Act have changed somewhat its wording, but not its essential meaning. See, e.g., Ga. L. 1978, p.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schrenko v. DeKalb County School District
582 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Malcom v. Newton County
535 S.E.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
In the Matter of Carpenter
288 S.E.2d 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 S.E.2d 35, 248 Ga. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lomax-v-mcbrayer-ga-1982.