Lomas v. . New York City Railway Company
81 N.E. 1169, 188 N.Y. 628, 26 Bedell 628, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1311
Opinion
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lomas v. . New York City Railway Company, 81 N.E. 1169, 188 N.Y. 628, 26 Bedell 628, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1311 (N.Y. 1907).
81 N.E. 1169 (Lomas v. . New York City Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bergman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
163 Misc. 762 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)
Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Grace
159 P. 1011 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Ramsey v. McKay
1915 OK 72 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Fitts
1914 OK 124 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Schonleben v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
160 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)