Lomas v. Kravitz

973 A.2d 414

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 3, 2009·No. 68 MM 2009·Published

Opinion

973 A.2d 414 (2009)

Roy H. LOMAS, Sr. d/b/a/ Roy Lomas Carpet Contractor, Respondent
v.
James B. KRAVITZ, Cherrydale Construction Company, Andorra Springs Development, Inc., and Kravmar, Inc., formerly known as Eastern Development Enterprises, Inc., Petitioners.

No. 68 MM 2009.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 3, 2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2009, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

973 A.2d 414 (2009)

Roy H. LOMAS, Sr. d/b/a/ Roy Lomas Carpet Contractor, Respondent
v.
James B. KRAVITZ, Cherrydale Construction Company, Andorra Springs Development, Inc., and Kravmar, Inc., formerly known as Eastern Development Enterprises, Inc., Petitioners.

No. 68 MM 2009.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 3, 2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2009, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.

Lomas v. Kravitz, 973 A.2d 414 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 414 (Lomas v. Kravitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.