Lomas Mortgage U S A, Creditor-Appellant v. Daniel Wiese Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellees. Lomas Mortgage U S A, Creditor, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Creditor-Appellee v. Daniel Wiese Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellants. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Noel G. Cervantes Arnel J. Cervantes, Goldome Realty Credit Corp., Creditor-Appellant v. Mark Christian Saugstad, F/dba/ Construction and Equipment Kathleen Celeste Saugstad, Debtors-Appellees
This text of 998 F.2d 764 (Lomas Mortgage U S A, Creditor-Appellant v. Daniel Wiese Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellees. Lomas Mortgage U S A, Creditor, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Creditor-Appellee v. Daniel Wiese Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellants. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Noel G. Cervantes Arnel J. Cervantes, Goldome Realty Credit Corp., Creditor-Appellant v. Mark Christian Saugstad, F/dba/ Construction and Equipment Kathleen Celeste Saugstad, Debtors-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
998 F.2d 764
LOMAS MORTGAGE
U S A, Creditor-Appellant,
v.
Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellees.
LOMAS MORTGAGE
U S A, Creditor,
and
Federal National Mortgage Association, Creditor-Appellee,
v.
Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellants.
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Noel G. CERVANTES; Arnel J. Cervantes, Defendants-Appellees.
GOLDOME REALTY CREDIT CORP., Creditor-Appellant,
v.
Mark Christian SAUGSTAD, f/dba/ Construction and Equipment;
Kathleen Celeste Saugstad, Debtors-Appellees.
Nos. 91-35924, 91-35950, 91-36082, 91-36173.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 26, 1993.
As Amended Sept, 15, 1993.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Prior report: --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2925, 124 L.Ed.2d 676.
Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The orders of the district court appealed from are vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Nobleman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2106, 124 L.Ed.2d 228 (1993).
Debtors' "Motion to Consider One Point on Remand" is DENIED, without prejudice to their raising it in the district court or bankruptcy court on remand from this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
998 F.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lomas-mortgage-u-s-a-creditor-appellant-v-daniel-wiese-sue-ann-wiese-ca9-1993.