Lola Padgett and Michael Dunn v. City of Madisonville, Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
Docket10-02-00199-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lola Padgett and Michael Dunn v. City of Madisonville, Texas (Lola Padgett and Michael Dunn v. City of Madisonville, Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lola Padgett and Michael Dunn v. City of Madisonville, Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Lola Padgett etal v. City of Madisonville TX


IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-02-199-CV


     LOLA PADGETT AND MICHAEL DUNN,

                                                                              Appellants

     v.


     CITY OF MADISONVILLE, TEXAS,

                                                                              Appellee


From the 278th District Court

Madison County, Texas

Trial Court # 01-95910278-10

CONCURRING OPINION

      I agree with the result but would sever the claims being remanded for further consideration from those being affirmed. See Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co., 699 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex. 1985); Hofer v. Lavender, 679 S.W.2d 470, 471 (Tex. 1984). The desirability of a severance appears to stem from the requirement that there be one final judgment in a case. Tex. R. Civ. P. 301; see Hamilton v. Prescott, 73 Tex. 565, 11 S.W. 548, 549 (1889). Authority to sever may be found in Rules of Appellate Procedure 43.6 and 44.1(b). Tex. R. App. P. 43.6, 44.1(b); see also Washington v. Reliable Life Ins. Co., 581 S.W.2d 153, 161 (Tex. 1979) (citing former rule of civil procedure 503 which used language similar to current Rule 44.1(b)).

      We have been inconsistent in our opinions about severance when an error affects only part of a judgment. Compare Ash v. Hack Branch Dist. Co., 54 S.W.3d 401, 419 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, pet. denied) (severance), with Cozby v. City of Waco, 110 S.W.3d 32, 41 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.) (no severance). But that is no reason not to sever claims that are being remanded from those on which the judgment is affirmed so as to make the latter unquestionably final.


                                                                       BILL VANCE

                                                                       Justice


Concurring opinion delivered and filed February 11, 2004

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ash v. Hack Branch Distributing Co., Inc.
54 S.W.3d 401 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Cozby v. City of Waco
110 S.W.3d 32 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co.
699 S.W.2d 821 (Texas Supreme Court, 1985)
Hofer v. Lavender
679 S.W.2d 470 (Texas Supreme Court, 1984)
Washington v. Reliable Life Insurance Co.
581 S.W.2d 153 (Texas Supreme Court, 1979)
J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. Prescott
11 S.W. 548 (Texas Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lola Padgett and Michael Dunn v. City of Madisonville, Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lola-padgett-and-michael-dunn-v-city-of-madisonvil-texapp-2004.