Lokeman v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

219 A.2d 15, 242 Md. 721, 1966 Md. LEXIS 687
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 29, 1966
DocketApp. No. 117
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.2d 15 (Lokeman v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lokeman v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 219 A.2d 15, 242 Md. 721, 1966 Md. LEXIS 687 (Md. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Miles C. Lokeman seeks leave to appeal from the denial of his application for post conviction relief from his three year sentence for the crime of escape. While serving a thirty year sentence imposed on October 25, 1961, the petitioner escaped from his confinement in the Maryland House of Correction. On his return, he received institutional punishment which included forfeiture of 121 days of accumulated good conduct time. Petitioner was indicted for the crime of escape. On a guilty plea, he was convicted by Judge Evans in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County and sentenced to three years, the sentence to run consecutively with sentences he was presently serving. He was represented by counsel at this trial. He did not appeal from this conviction.

In this application for relief he contends (1) that his escape was no escape at all because, although he had been sentenced to serve 30 years in the Maryland Penitentiary, when he escaped he was being confined in the Maryland House of Correction, (2) that because he received institutional punishment, his conviction and sentence for escape constitutes double jeopardy, (3) that his indictment was invalid under Schowgurow v. State, 240 Md. 121, 213 A. 2d 475 (1965).

An evidentiary hearing was held on December 3, 1965; Judge Childs denied relief in a memorandum and order filed December 6, 1965. The application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons stated in Judge Childs’ memorandum. While Judge Childs did not expressly answer the petitioner’s first contention, he did find that the petitioner was legally transferred from the Maryland Penitentiary to the House of Correction. Such transfer was authorized by Code (1965 Supp.), Art. 27, § 690 (a).

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
224 A.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.2d 15, 242 Md. 721, 1966 Md. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lokeman-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1966.