Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc.
Opinion
The first, third and fourth questions certified are improper in form.
We interpret the second question as propounding an inquiry whether specific performance may be granted to an assignee of such a contract as is pleaded in the complaint if he has failed to tender a bond executed by his assignor. So interpreting it, the answer must be “ no.”
The order should be affirmed, with costs; the second question certified answered no; and the other questions are not answered.
Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Cbane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Beien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
171 N.E. 791 (Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.