Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc.

171 N.E. 791, 253 N.Y. 579, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 950
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 1930·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first, third and fourth questions certified are improper in form.

We interpret the second question as propounding an inquiry whether specific performance may be granted to an assignee of such a contract as is pleaded in the complaint if he has failed to tender a bond executed by his assignor. So interpreting it, the answer must be “ no.”

The order should be affirmed, with costs; the second question certified answered no; and the other questions are not answered.

Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Cbane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Beien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc., 171 N.E. 791, 253 N.Y. 579, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 950 (N.Y. 1930).

171 N.E. 791 (Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Grove Rich Realty Corp.
200 B.R. 502 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Saltair Shinnecock, Inc. v. Yarroll
56 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Fort M Development Corp. v. Inland Credit Corp.
54 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Sprague v. Dugan
268 A.2d 465 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1970)
Lee v. Ravanis
212 N.E.2d 480 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)
Cochran v. Taylor
156 Misc. 750 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)
Tarolli v. Syracuse Investment Corp.
151 Misc. 634 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Johnson
235 A.D. 68 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)