Loiselle v. Wacker

Supreme Court of Florida

Loiselle v. Wacker

300 So. 2d 665, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4761

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 10, 1974·No. Nos. 44628, 44640·Published

Opinion

ADKINS, Chief Justice:

Certiorari was granted in this cause to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Loiselle v. Wacker, 283 So.2d 913) on grounds of direct conflict with the opinion of this Court in Marley v. Saunders, 249 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1971). Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 3(b) (3), F.S.A.

We have dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and on authority of our decision in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., Fla., 297 So.2d 1 opinion filed June 19, 1974, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the District Court consider petitioner’s appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADKINS, Chief Justice:

Certiorari was granted in this cause to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Loiselle v. Wacker, 283 So.2d 913) on grounds of direct conflict with the opinion of this Court in Marley v. Saunders, 249 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1971). Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 3(b) (3), F.S.A.

We have dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and on authority of our decision in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., Fla., 297 So.2d 1 opinion filed June 19, 1974, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the District Court consider petitioner’s appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

Loiselle v. Wacker, 300 So. 2d 665, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4761 (Fla. 1974).

Pincite

300 So. 2d 665 (Loiselle v. Wacker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related