Loiseau v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Loiseau v. United States

678 F. App'x 187

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2017·No. No. 16-7395·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM;

Michael Angelo Loiseau appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Loiseau’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Loiseau v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY, 2016 WL 5019165 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM;

Michael Angelo Loiseau appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Loiseau’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Loiseau v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00417-REP-RCY, 2016 WL 5019165 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Loiseau v. United States, 678 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 187 (Loiseau v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related