Loiseau v. Norris

465 F. App'x 273
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2012·No. No. 11-7293·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Loiseau appeals the district court’s order adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Loiseau’s civil rights action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Loiseau’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Loiseau has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loiseau v. Norris, 465 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2012).

465 F. App'x 273 (Loiseau v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.