Loiseau v. Norris
This text of 465 F. App'x 273 (Loiseau v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael A. Loiseau appeals the district court’s order adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Loiseau’s civil rights action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Loiseau’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Loiseau has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 F. App'x 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loiseau-v-norris-ca4-2012.