Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock

202 N.C. 823

DecidedJanuary 27, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.C. 823 (Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock, 202 N.C. 823 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendants made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motion was granted and in this we think there was error.

We have read with care the evidence of plaintiff and think it sufficient to be submitted to a jury. We will not-set it forth or discuss the law, as the case goes back to be heard before a jury. There must be a

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendants made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motion was granted and in this we think there was error.

We have read with care the evidence of plaintiff and think it sufficient to be submitted to a jury. We will not-set it forth or discuss the law, as the case goes back to be heard before a jury. There must be a

New trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.C. 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lohr-ex-rel-lohr-v-rothrock-ex-rel-rothrock-nc-1932.