Lohnes v. Martinez

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana
DecidedFebruary 7, 2020
Docket2:18-cv-00445
StatusUnknown

This text of Lohnes v. Martinez (Lohnes v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lohnes v. Martinez, (N.D. Ind. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

JAMES ANDREW LOHNES,

Plaintiff,

v. CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CV-445-JTM-JEM

MRS. JOHNSON,

Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER James Andrew Lohnes, an unrepresented pretrial detainee in the Lake County Jail, filed a motion asking the court to enjoin Mrs. Johnson from handling mail related to this lawsuit. Mrs. Johnson is the defendant in this case and presumably an employee of the jail. “[A] preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997). To obtain a preliminary injunction, the moving party must show (1) he will suffer irreparable harm before the final resolution of his claims; (2) available remedies at law are inadequate; and (3) he has a likelihood of success on the merits. See BBL, Inc. v. City of Angola, 809 F.3d 317, 323–24 (7th Cir. 2015). Here, Lohnes has not demonstrated he can meet any of these requirements. He is proceeding in this case against Mrs. Johnson for monetary damages related to a single past event where he alleges she placed him in danger by threatening to punish other inmates. Even if his mail is destroyed, he will not suffer irreparable harm because he has an adequate remedy at law. See Marshall v. Knight, 445 F.3d 965, 968 (7th Cir. 2006);

Van den Bosch v. Raemisch, 658 F.3d 778, 785 (7th Cir. 2011). Moreover, this case is not actually about his mail, so he has no chance of success on the merits of a claim about his mail in this lawsuit. For these reasons, the motion (DE # 44) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: February 7, 2020 s/James T. Moody . JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Den Bosch v. Raemisch
658 F.3d 778 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)
Kenneth A. Marshall v. Stanley Knight
445 F.3d 965 (Seventh Circuit, 2006)
Mazurek v. Armstrong
520 U.S. 968 (Supreme Court, 1997)
BBL, Inc. v. City of Angola
809 F.3d 317 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lohnes v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lohnes-v-martinez-innd-2020.