Lohmiller v. Gotwals

29 A.2d 206, 150 Pa. Super. 539, 1942 Pa. Super. LEXIS 209
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 28, 1942·No. Appeal, 279·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,-

Rents for a property held by husband and wife as tenants by entireties were collected by defendants who acted as real estate agents for the property. The net rents were paid as received during the rental periods to the husband by defendants. The wife claims that she was entitled to an accounting by defendants for her share.

Either spouse, where land is held by entireties and so long as the marriage subsists, has the power to lease and receive the rents as they accrue and give an acquittance for the money so paid. Fish et ux. v. Kaye, 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 49, 53, 4 A. 2d 190; Wakefield v. Wakefield, 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 9, 13, 25 A. 2d 841; Gasner v. Pierce et al., 286 Pa. 529, 533, 134 A. 494; O’Malley v. O’Malley, 272 Pa. 528, 533, 116 A. 500; Madden et al. v. Gosztonyi Savings & Trust Co., 331 Pa. 476, 488, 200 A. 624.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lohmiller v. Gotwals, 29 A.2d 206, 150 Pa. Super. 539, 1942 Pa. Super. LEXIS 209 (Pa. Ct. App. 1942).

29 A.2d 206 (Lohmiller v. Gotwals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Evans
421 B.R. 193 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cobrin v. Aisenstein
40 Pa. D. & C.2d 68 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1966)
Glover v. Manupelli
30 Pa. D. & C.2d 613 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1962)
Wallaesa v. Wallaesa
100 A.2d 149 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Derby v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 164 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
Bean v. Harleysville National Bank
51 A.2d 394 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Shapiro v. Fischman
45 A.2d 230 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Holladay v. Fidler
43 A.2d 919 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)