Lohman v. State

921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 2010·No. 2009-2113·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-080957. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lohman v. State, 921 N.E.2d 245, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2010).

921 N.E.2d 245 (Lohman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bodyke, H-07-040 (12-5-2008)
2008 Ohio 6387 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)