Lohden v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lohden v. State

119 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 650

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 8, 1929

Docket6 Div. 396.

StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 923 (Lohden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lohden v. State, 119 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 650 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial is not presented, as there is no bill of exceptions in the record. The appeal being upon the record proper, the regularity of such record here is the only matter for the consideration of this court. This appellant was convicted under an indictment charging the larceny of an automobile, the property of one R. R. Vines, and in the second count, upon which the verdict is rested, with buying, receiving, or concealing the automobile in question, knowing that it was stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. He was sentenced by the court to serve not less than nine years’ nor more than ten years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. The record is without error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial is not presented, as there is no bill of exceptions in the record. The appeal being upon the record proper, the regularity of such record here is the only matter for the consideration of this court. This appellant was convicted under an indictment charging the larceny of an automobile, the property of one R. R. Vines, and in the second count, upon which the verdict is rested, with buying, receiving, or concealing the automobile in question, knowing that it was stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. He was sentenced by the court to serve not less than nine years’ nor more than ten years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. The record is without error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lohden-v-state-alactapp-1929.