Loh v. Howard
81 S.E. 198, 141 Ga. 509, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 23
This text of 81 S.E. 198 (Loh v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Loh v. Howard, 81 S.E. 198, 141 Ga. 509, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 23 (Ga. 1914).
Opinion
1. The evidence in this case is conflicting, and the court below did not abuse its discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from maintaining a “blind tiger” and selling intoxicating beers and intoxicating liquors at the place.
2. Grounds of exception not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error will not be considered.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. Stark
31 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
81 S.E. 198, 141 Ga. 509, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loh-v-howard-ga-1914.