Logue v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Logue v. State

196 S.E. 801, 185 Ga. 852, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 549

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 16, 1938

DocketNo. 12068

StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.E. 801 (Logue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Logue v. State, 196 S.E. 801, 185 Ga. 852, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 549 (Ga. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

While the evidence on a trial for murder was entirely circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the conviction. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Louis H. Foster and Clayton Balcer, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-geneml, Carl E. Crow, solicitor-general, A. B. Conger, Filis Q. Arnall, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

While the evidence on a trial for murder was entirely circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the conviction. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Louis H. Foster and Clayton Balcer, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-geneml, Carl E. Crow, solicitor-general, A. B. Conger, Filis Q. Arnall, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 S.E. 801, 185 Ga. 852, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logue-v-state-ga-1938.