Logue v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Logue v. State

196 S.E. 801, 185 Ga. 852, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 549

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1938·No. No. 12068·Published

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

While the evidence on a trial for murder was entirely circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the conviction. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Louis H. Foster and Clayton Balcer, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-geneml, Carl E. Crow, solicitor-general, A. B. Conger, Filis Q. Arnall, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

While the evidence on a trial for murder was entirely circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the conviction. The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Louis H. Foster and Clayton Balcer, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-geneml, Carl E. Crow, solicitor-general, A. B. Conger, Filis Q. Arnall, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Logue v. State, 196 S.E. 801, 185 Ga. 852, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 549 (Ga. 1938).

Pincite

196 S.E. 801 (Logue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.