Logsden v. Willis

77 Ky. 183, 14 Bush 183, 1878 Ky. LEXIS 56
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided September 14, 1878·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

CHIEF JUSTICE PRYOR

delivered the opinion of the court.

By section 295, Civil Code, it will be found that it is only in cases where proceedings on a judgment have been stayed by an injunction that the chancellor immediately, on the dissolution, is empowered to ascertain the damages and to render a [184] judgment for them. In all other cases the remedy is on the injunction-bond. Why the legislature restricted the power of the chancellor to cases only where judgments have been enjoined, is not necessary to determine. The language of the Code is plain and admits of no other construction.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Logsden v. Willis, 77 Ky. 183, 14 Bush 183, 1878 Ky. LEXIS 56 (Ky. Ct. App. 1878).

77 Ky. 183 (Logsden v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mason, Gooch & Hoge Co. v. Mechanics' Lien & Trust Co.
82 S.W. 290 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1904)
Hayden's Adm'r v. Phillips' Adm'r
11 S.W. 951 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1889)
Alexander v. Gish
9 S.W. 801 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1888)
Greer v. Stewart
48 Ark. 21 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Sartor v. Strassheim
8 Colo. 185 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1884)
Love v. Harrison
10 Ky. Op. 572 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1880)