Logsden v. Willis
This text of 77 Ky. 183 (Logsden v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
By section 295, Civil Code, it will be found that it is only in cases where proceedings on a judgment have been stayed by an injunction that the chancellor immediately, on the dissolution, is empowered to ascertain the damages and to render a [184]*184judgment for them. In all other cases the remedy is on the injunction-bond. Why the legislature restricted the power of the chancellor to cases only where judgments have been enjoined, is not necessary to determine. The language of the Code is plain and admits of no other construction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Ky. 183, 14 Bush 183, 1878 Ky. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logsden-v-willis-kyctapp-1878.