LoGiudice v. Silverstein Properties, Inc.

48 A.D.3d 286, 851 N.Y.S.2d 187
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 48 A.D.3d 286 (LoGiudice v. Silverstein Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LoGiudice v. Silverstein Properties, Inc., 48 A.D.3d 286, 851 N.Y.S.2d 187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J), entered December 18, 2006, which, in an action for personal injuries, denied defendants’ and third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment dismissing the complaint is not warranted even assuming, in favor of defendants building owner and [287]*287management company, that they did not have notice of any defect in the allegedly “curled-up” rain mat over which plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant building maintenance contractor, tripped upon arriving for work in the early morning, and that fault for the accident can be ascribed only to third-party defendant, whose night-shift employee put the mat down before any of defendants’ employees had arrived for work. For this building that was open to the public, defendants had a nondelegable duty to provide the public, including third-party defendant’s employees, with reasonably safe means of ingress and egress, and can be held vicariously liable for any negligence by third-party defendant that caused the entrance to become unsafe (Backiel v Citibank, 299 AD2d 504 [2002]; see generally Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270, 274 [1993]). Issues of fact exist as to whether, inter alia, the mat made the entrance to the building unsafe. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singh v. Tribeca Kitchen LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 31119(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Brown v. Window King LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 00857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Tobola v. 123 Wash., LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 03537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Jean-Francois v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
137 A.D.3d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Blatt v. L'Pogee, Inc.
112 A.D.3d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Dabbagh v. Newmark Knight Frank Global Management Services, LLC
99 A.D.3d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Araujo v. Mercer Square Owners Corp.
33 Misc. 3d 835 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)
Podlaski v. Long Island Paneling Center of Centereach, Inc.
58 A.D.3d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.3d 286, 851 N.Y.S.2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logiudice-v-silverstein-properties-inc-nyappdiv-2008.