Logicalis, Inc. v. Object Edge, Inc.

• Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
• Decided: April 16, 2020
• Docket: 2:20-cv-10521
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

LOGICALIS, INC.,

Plaintiff, Case Number 20-10521 v. Honorable David M. Lawson

OBJECT EDGE, INC.,

Defendant. / ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT On February 28, 2020, the plaintiff filed its complaint seeking recovery for an alleged breach of contract and fraud. On April 13, 2020, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4), the Court may set a time for serving an answer when a motion has been served under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4) (“Unless the court sets a different time, serving a motion under this rule alters these periods as follows . . . .”); Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, 237 F.R.D. 613, 617 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (“[T]his Court recognizes that Rule 12(a)(4) also provides that a court may order an answer to be filed at a time other than after the motion to dismiss has been denied or the court has postponed consideration of the motion.”) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)) (emphasis in original). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant must file it answer to the complaint on or before May 7, 2020. s/David M. Lawson DAVID M. LAWSON United States District Judge

Dated: April 16, 2020