Loggains v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Loggains v. State

39 So. 2d 58, 34 Ala. App. 684

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 11, 1949

Docket6 Div. 774.

StatusPublished

This text of 39 So. 2d 58 (Loggains v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loggains v. State, 39 So. 2d 58, 34 Ala. App. 684 (Ala. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case was proper in form and substance. It contained two counts, (1) charged the defendant with distilling, e’tc., alcoholic, spirituous, malted or mixed liquors or beverages.; (2) the unlawful possession of a still to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors or beverages, contrary to law.

There was no dispute or conflict in the evidence, which consisted solely of the testimony of the witnesses for the State. The defendant offered none.

The State’s testimony was full and complete and made out the case in its every detail. No special written charges were requested, nor was any exception reserved to the action of the court in overruling and denying the motion for a new trial.

Upon this appeal no question of merit is presented, and such insistences as are attempted need no discussion.

The judgment of conviction from.which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI