Logeman v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Logeman v. Director of Revenue

221 S.W.3d 448, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 709, 2007 WL 1341444

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2007·No. No. WD 66505·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Logeman appeals from a circuit court judgment affirming the revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a breath test. Mr. Logeman contends the evidence was insufficient to prove that the arresting officer had probable cause to believe that he drove while intoxicated. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Logeman appeals from a circuit court judgment affirming the revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a breath test. Mr. Logeman contends the evidence was insufficient to prove that the arresting officer had probable cause to believe that he drove while intoxicated. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(a).

Logeman v. Director of Revenue, 221 S.W.3d 448, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 709, 2007 WL 1341444 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

221 S.W.3d 448 (Logeman v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.