Logan v. Wilson Cypress Co.

156 So. 689, 116 Fla. 350, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1064

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 26, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a foreclosure suit.

There are assignments of error and cross assignments of error. All assignments of error are based upon alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the decree.

We can not say that there is not to be found in the record substantial evidence to support the decree. Therefore, we can not say that it has been clearly shown that the decree of the Chancellor was without substantial supporting evidence.

Therefore, the decree should be affirmed and it is so ordered. ■

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a foreclosure suit.

There are assignments of error and cross assignments of error. All assignments of error are based upon alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the decree.

Therefore, the decree should be affirmed and it is so ordered. ■

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Logan v. Wilson Cypress Co., 156 So. 689, 116 Fla. 350, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1064 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

156 So. 689 (Logan v. Wilson Cypress Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.