Logan v. Tennessee Chemical Co.

144 S.E. 351, 38 Ga. App. 534, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 333
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 1, 1928
Docket18176; 18177
StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 351 (Logan v. Tennessee Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Logan v. Tennessee Chemical Co., 144 S.E. 351, 38 Ga. App. 534, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 333 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

In accordance with the answer returned by the Supreme Court to the one controlling question involved in these cases, as certified to it by this court (166 Ga. 680, 144 S. E. 269), the trial court erred in refusing to grant the motion for a new trial made by the plaintiff in the court below. The grant of a new trial to the plaintiff, under its motion, in accordance with the rulings of the Supreme Court, being controlling, the writ of error sued out by the defendant in the court below is dismissed.

Judgment reversed in No. 18177. Write of error dismissed in No. 18176.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logan v. Tennessee Chemical Co.
144 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 351, 38 Ga. App. 534, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-v-tennessee-chemical-co-gactapp-1928.