Logan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Logan v. State

1925 OK CR 48, 232 P. 961, 29 Okla. Crim. 104, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 51

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 31, 1925

DocketNo. A-4805.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 48 (Logan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Logan v. State, 1925 OK CR 48, 232 P. 961, 29 Okla. Crim. 104, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 51 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The information in this case charges that on July 30, 1922, the defendant, Gus Logan, did have in his possession four gallons of corn whisky, with the unlawful intent to sell the same. His trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days. He appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict, but no brief has been filed, and no appearance made in his behalf in this court.

An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in the rulings upon the admission of testimony, and the instructions fully state the law applicable to the case.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

The information in this case charges that on July 30, 1922, the defendant, Gus Logan, did have in his possession four gallons of corn whisky, with the unlawful intent to sell the same. His trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days. He appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict, but no brief has been filed, and no appearance made in his behalf in this court.

An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in the rulings upon the admission of testimony, and the instructions fully state the law applicable to the case.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 48, 232 P. 961, 29 Okla. Crim. 104, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.