Logan v. State
969 S.W.2d 388, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1201, 1998 WL 326858
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Logan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1155 →
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph Logan appeals the circuit court’s judgment to dismiss his motion for postcon-viction relief because it did not satisfy the filing deadline of Rule 24.035. He challenges the deadline as unconstitutional. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 866, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989) (holding time limits of Rule 24.035 to [389]*389be valid and mandatory). We enter this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Logan v. State, 969 S.W.2d 388, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1201, 1998 WL 326858 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
969 S.W.2d 388 (Logan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)
Jacobowitz v. United States
493 U.S. 866 (Supreme Court, 1989)