Logan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Logan v. State

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420389, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-3029

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 3d 1045 (Logan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Logan v. State, 115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420389, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion before the two-year time limitation following the direct appeal mandate expires. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); [1046]*1046Lawson v. State, 754 So.2d 86, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing two forms of the oath for use in rule 3.850 motions).

MAY, C.J., STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion before the two-year time limitation following the direct appeal mandate expires. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); [1046]*1046Lawson v. State, 754 So.2d 86, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing two forms of the oath for use in rule 3.850 motions).

MAY, C.J., STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420389, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack