Logan v. State

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420389, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 4D12-3029·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion before the two-year time limitation following the direct appeal mandate expires. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); [1046] Lawson v. State, 754 So.2d 86, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing two forms of the oath for use in rule 3.850 motions).

MAY, C.J., STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Logan v. State, 115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420389, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

115 So. 3d 1045 (Logan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. State
754 So. 2d 86 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)