Logan v. State

21 So. 3d 917, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17354, 2009 WL 3837154
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 2009·No. 4D09-4118·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Logan v. State, 1 So.3d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Appellant is cautioned that continued abuse of the post-conviction process by filing frivolous or repetitive motions and/or appeals will result in sanctions. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); Thurston v. State, 920 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

WARNER, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Logan v. State, 21 So. 3d 917, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17354, 2009 WL 3837154 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

21 So. 3d 917 (Logan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jermaine D. Logan v. State
149 So. 3d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Steed v. State
120 So. 3d 113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
West v. State
115 So. 3d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Collins v. State
97 So. 3d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Brown v. State
56 So. 3d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)