Logan v. Lee

13 S.W. 422, 53 Ark. 94, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 38
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 29, 1890·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When the defendant returned to the premises in question, he found the plaintiff’s vendor in the peaceable possession through his agent, Roberts, who forbade his entry. Through threats, which amounted to force, he entered into possession. The remedy adopted in this'suit was designed to protect the actual possession whether right or wrong. Johnson v. West, 41 Ark., 540. Whatever the defendant’s rights under his contract of lease may be, he can not litigate them in this action.

The first instruction given at the instance of the defendant was erroneous, and the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Logan v. Lee, 13 S.W. 422, 53 Ark. 94, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 38 (Ark. 1890).

13 S.W. 422 (Logan v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGee v. Nuckols
136 F. Supp. 948 (E.D. Arkansas, 1955)
Wall v. Robling
183 S.W.2d 605 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1944)
Prioleau v. Williams
149 S.W. 101 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Washington v. Moore
105 S.W. 253 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)
Vinson v. Flynn
43 S.W. 146 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1897)