Logan v. Irvin
This text of 57 S.E. 934 (Logan v. Irvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although there have been argued to us in this case-many questions of law, and the briefs are full of both rhyme and reason, yet, after a careful study of the record, we find nothing but a bare issue .of fact, already decided adversely to the plaintiff in error by the trial court and jury. The argument of the plaintiff in error is unique, being presented in verse. However, when we compare the poetic argument with the record, we find that' Shakespeare was correct in saying: “The poet’s eye, in a fine frenzy rolling, doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven,, and, as imagination bodies forth the forms of things unknown, the-poet’s pen turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing a local habitation and a name;” and that Pope is not to be trusted in saying that “Truth shines the brighter clad in verse.” The “thoughts that breathe and words that burn” must not be allowed to override the merciless logic of the law, which dictates that appellate courts must not disturb a verdict supported by the evidence and approved by the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 S.E. 934, 1 Ga. App. 656, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-v-irvin-gactapp-1907.