Logan v. FARMERS'DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH
214 U.S. 500, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1060, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1938
This text of 214 U.S. 500 (Logan v. FARMERS'DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Logan v. FARMERS'DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH, 214 U.S. 500, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1060, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1938 (1909).
Opinion
LOGAN
v.
FARMERS' DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. B.M. Ambler and Mr. A. Leo Weil for the appellees in support of the motion.
*501 Mr. Hector M. Hitchings for the appellants in opposition thereto.
Per Curiam:
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of Coder, Trustee, v. Arts, 213 U.S. 223.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coder v. Arts
213 U.S. 223 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Logan v. Farmers' Deposit National Bank of Pittsburgh
214 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
214 U.S. 500, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1060, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-v-farmersdeposit-national-bank-of-pittsburgh-scotus-1909.